Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 OHIOST3D 95 - Cicco v. Stockmaster

Cicco v. Stockmaster’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

92
cited by 92 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

84 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Butler v. Jordan (2001), Grover v. Bartsch (2006)

84 state decisions

720200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Malloy v. City of Westlake · 67 Ohio St. 3d 180 - Ohioans for Fair Representation, Inc. v. Taft

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “.. .if any statute or the ordinance or franchise is alleged to be unconstitutional, the attorney general also shall be served with a copy of the complaint in the action or proceeding and shall be heard. In any action or proceeding that involves the validity of a township resolution, the township shall be made a party and shall be heard.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A party who is challenging the constitutionality of a statute must assert the claim in the complaint (or other initial pleading) or an amendment thereto, and must serve the pleading upon the Attorney General in accordance with methods set forth in Civ.R. 4.1 in order to vest a trial court with jurisdiction under former R.C. 2721.12 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““When declaratory relief is sought, all persons shall be made parties who have or claim any interest which would be affected by the declaration. No declaration shall prejudice the rights of persons not parties to the proceeding. * * * [I]f any statute * * * is alleged to be unconstitutional, the attorney general shall also be served with a copy of the proceeding and shall be heard. * * *” 2”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.