Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 Okla. 249 - Tiger v. McCallom

Tiger v. McCallom’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 1985
most recently cited

1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 1985

1 district · 7 state decisions

401923193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McKee v. Thornton · Conservative Loan Co. v. Saulsbury

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When it is represented to the county court upon verified petition of any relative or friend, that any person is insane, or from any cause mentally incompetent to manage his property, the judge must cause notice-to be given to the supposed insane or incompetent person of the time and place of hearing the case, not less than five days before the time so appointed, and such person, if able to attend, must be produced before him on the hearing.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.