Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

89 Okla. 80

213 P 737

Hodges v. Simpson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 17, 1922

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1922-01-17

Error from District Oourt, Choctaw County; C. E. Dudley, Judge. Action by Rose Hodges against Loyd Simpson and others to collect rents from farming land and for appointment of receiver to take charge of the crops and subject them to payment of rents. Court refused to appoint receiver, and plaintiff appeals.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1922-01-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2010

5 state decisions

401922193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 On Rehearing.

PER CTJRTAM.

¶2 There have been two opinions of this court in the above entitled and numbered cause. On December 13, 1921, the opinion of this court, by Mr. Justice Miller, reversed and remanded the cause, with instructions to the trial court to proceed further in accordance-with the views therein expressed; on December 26th, thereafter, the defendants in error filed their petition for rehearing, which petition was granted by this court on January 10, 1922; thereafter. *85 on January 17, 1022, there was an opinion of this court by the then Mr. Justice Biting, affirming the judgment of the trial court; thereafter, on January 28, 1922, the plaintiff in error filed her petition for rehearing; and thereafter, on February 14, .1922, it was ordered by this court that the latter opinion be withdrawn and the original opinion reinstated; on February 20, 1922, a supplemental motion for rehearing was filed, and a response thereto filed on February 23, 1922; on March 17, 1922, a rehearing was granted and application for oral argument on rehearing was likewise granted, and the same was heard on December 12, 1922, and at that time the cause was submitted on such oral arguments and briefs of counsel.

¶3 We have carefully re-examined the record, as well as the opinions heretofore rendered, aforesaid, and the oral arguments and briefs of counsel have been fully considered, and we are clearly of the opinion that the opinion of this court by Mr. Justice Elting, rendered on January 17, 1922. should be adhered to and be filed as the opinion in the cause; and it is so ordered.

/89/okla/80 · .json · Public domain