89 Okla. Crim. 284 - Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

12 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““1. Where the evidence is conflicting, and different inferences may be drawn therefrom, it is the province of the jury to weigh the same and determine the facts. “2. The function of the Criminal Court of Appeals is limited to ascertaining whether there is a basis, in the evidence, on which the jury can reasonably conclude that the accused is guilty as charged.””

   5 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Brown v. State · 93 Okla. Crim. 145 - Copenhaver v. State

2. ““1.. Where the evidence is conflicting and different inferences niay be drawn therefrom, it is the province of the jury to weigh the same and determine the facts. “2. The function of the Criminal Court of Appeals is limited to ascertaining whether there is a basis, in the evidence, on which the jury can reasonably conclude that the accused is guilty as charged.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 92 Okla. Crim. 53 - Woods v. State