¶1Defendant was convicted for possession of a controlled substance and for delivery of a controlled substance. Both convictions arose out of the same transaction and involved the same drug. The state concedes, and we agree, that there should have been only one conviction. State v. Finn, 79 Or App 439, 719 P2d 898 (1986).
¶2Judgments vacated; remanded for entry of a single judgment of conviction and for resentencing.