Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 S.D. 1 - State v. Nelsen

State v. Nelsen’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
8
states following
July 2000
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 2000 · most notably State v. Batiste (1978), Commonwealth v. Weiskerger (1989)

32 state decisions

2001975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Russell · Sorrells v. United States · Sherman v. United States · 55 Cal. 2d 27 - People v. Sweeney · 62 Cal. 2d 769 - People v. Perez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an innocent person lured into committing a crime.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Goodroad · State v. Moeller
  2. ““When the criminal design originates, not with the accused, but is conceived in the mind of the government officers, and the accused is by persuasion, deceitful representation, or inducement lured into the commission of a criminal act”. Sorrells v. United States, 1932, 287 U.S. 435, 445 , 53 S.Ct. 210, 214 , 77 L.Ed. 413, 418 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Iverson
  3. “It is important to note that evidence of prior convictions or criminal reputation should be admitted if it is admissible on independent grounds. The entrapment defense may not be used as a shield to prevent the admission of evidence admissible upon grounds unrelated to the defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Cochrun

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.