Tyler v. Tyler’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 1988
most recently cited
1 district · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kressly v. Kressly · Masek v. Masek · Kuehn v. Kuehn · Peterson v. Peterson · Caldwell v. Caldwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The duration of the marriage, the value of the property of each, their ages, their health and competency to earn, the contribution of each to the accumulation of the property and the faults and circumstances leading' up to the divorce, [citations omitted]” Tyler v. Tyler, S.D., 233 N.W.2d 804, 805 (1975).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wall v. Wall
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.