Dail v. Vodicka’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently February 2015
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hepburn Dundas' Heirs and Executors v. Dunlop Company · Baker v. Jewell · Kindley v. Williams · Eggers v. Eggers · 22 Wash. 2d 257 - Best v. Kelley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is a fundamental rule of contract construction that the entire contract, and each and all of its parts and provisions must be given meaning if that can be consistently and reasonably done.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.