Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

89 So. 2d 349

McMannus v. Midland Constructors, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 31, 1956

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1956-07-31

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1968

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1956-07-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that -it is-manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need! no further argument; • -

¶2*350It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to 'affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

¶3Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., THOMAS and HOBSON, JJ., and ROWE, Associate Justice, concur.
/89/so2d/349 · .json · Public domain