Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

89 So. 2d 649

Dade County v. Houk

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 23, 1956

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1956-05-23

Relies on 47 So. 2d 602 - Dade County v. Brigham

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1956-05-23

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1973

6 state decisions

30195619601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellees to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant tó 31 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument ;

¶2It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

¶3Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

¶4On Rehearing Granted

PER CURIAM.

¶5On rehearing granted and after oral argu-. ment before the Court en banc, it is Ordered that the per curiam opinion and judgment of this Court affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County appealed, from, be and the same is hereby adhered to on the authority of Dade County v. Brigham, Fla., 47 So.2d 602, 18 A.L.R.2d 1221, which case is hereby, in all respects approved and confirmed.

DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, HOBSON, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
/89/so2d/649 · .json · Public domain