Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 954 So. 2d 968 - Ross v. State · 921 So. 2d 292 - Spicer v. State · 823 So. 2d 473 - Caston v. State · 486 So. 2d 360 - Malone v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If during the course of trial, the prosecution attempts to introduce evidence which has not been timely disclosed to the defense as required by these rules, and the defense objects to the introduction for that reason, the court shall act as follows: 1. Grant the defense a reasonable opportunity to interview the newly discovered witness, to examine the newly produced documents, photographs[,] or other evidence; and 2. If, after such opportunity, the defense claims unfair surprise or undue prejudice and seeks a continuance or mistrial, the court shall, in the interest of justice and absent unusual circumstances, exclude the evidence or grant a continuance for a period of time reasonably necessary for the defense to meet the non-disclosed evidence or grant a mistrial. 3.The court shall not be required to grant either a continuance or mistrial for such a discovery violation if the prosecution withdraws its efforts to introduce such evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“it is not error to comment on the defense's failure to offer any evidence whatsoever to counter or explain the State's evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“improper to argue in closing that a defendant's case is inadequate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.