Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 SW2D 482 - White v. Hebberd

White v. Hebberd’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2006

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

4019361940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Allen v. Allen · Welder v. Lambert · Smith v. Butler · Creamer v. Briscoe · Stiles v. Hawkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The status of property as separate or community is fixed by the facts of acquisition at time thereof. Janes v. Gulf Production Company (Tex.Civ.App.) 15 S.W.(2d) 1102 ; Allen v. Allen, 101 Tex. 362 , 107 S.W. 528 ; Creamer v. Briscoe, 101 Tex. 490 , 109 S.W. 911 , 17 L.R.A.(N.S.) 154, 130 Am.St.Rep. 869 ; Welder v. Lambert, 91 Tex. 510 , 44 S.W. 281 ; Stiles v. Hawkins (Tex.Com.App.) 207 S.W. 89 . And the fact that part of the consideration is paid out of the community estate or the separate estate of the other spouse, or that improvements are placed thereon by such estates, does not alter that status. Such payments, while they may constitute an equity or a charge for which the party contributing may be entitled to reimbursement in an action of equitable partition, create no title or interest in the land as such. Dakan v. Dakan, 125 Tex. 305 , 83 S.W.(2d) 620 , and cases cited.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.