Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 SW3D 380 - Sanders v. Commonwealth

Sanders v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc · Ake v. Oklahoma · Pennsylvania v. Ritchie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We believe it is prudent to set out the standard of review of claims raised in a collateral attack under RCr 11.42. Such a motion is limited to issues that were not and could not be raised on direct appeal. An issue raised and rejected on direct appeal may not be relitigated in these proceedings by claiming that it amounts to ineffective assistance of counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he party invoking the marital privilege has the burden of proving its applicability. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.