Thompson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 208th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Darden v. Wainwright · Mosley v. State · Long v. State · Bauder v. State · Martinez v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“designed to arouse the passion and prejudices of the jury and as such are highly inappropriate.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Zunker v. State · Klock v. State“by urging the jury to consider matters not before them, and while effectively acknowledging that to do so was a violation of their solemn oath as jurors ... violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and implicated the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Zunker v. State · Klock v. State“En Banc Consideration Disfavored. En banc consideration of a case is not favored and should not be ordered unless necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of a court's decisions or unless extraordinary circumstances require en banc consideration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. In Re VV
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.