Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 Tex. Crim. 149 - Crow v. State

89 Tex. Crim. 149 - Crow v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1921

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
6
states following
March 2000
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2000

16 state decisions

50192119301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the court declined to require him to answer because of this reason he was in error; in the absence of a statutory enactment in this state making communications between physicians and their patients privileged, they cannot claim this right.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.