89 Tex. Crim. 62
229 S.W 515
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided March 23, 1921
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1921-03-23
<p>Tick Eradication—Companion Case—Practice on Appeal.</p> <p>Where the questions of law involved in the instant case were raised in two companion cases, and were decided adversely to the appellant, they need not he again considered, and the judgment is affirmed. Following Walker v. State, recently decided.</p>
Decided 1921-03-23
¶1 Appellant was convicted for violating the tick quarantine law in failing to dip his cattle when directed so to do.
¶2 We find the facts practically identical with those-shown in the case of W. B. Walker v. State, this day decided. And the same questions of law are raised in the two cases. Believing the Walker case to have been properly disposed of by affirmance, a discussion of the same questions here would be useless.
¶3 The judgment is affirmed.
¶4 Affirmed.