89 Wash. 2d
Volume 89 — Washington Reports, Second Series
106 opinions
- 89 Wash. 2d 1Northwest Trollers Ass'n v. Moos (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 6Associates Realty Credit Ltd. v. Brune (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 16English Bay Enterprises, Ltd. v. Island County (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 23Strenge v. Clarke (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 36Columbia Basin College Ass'n of Higher Education v. Board of Trustees of Columbia Basin College (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 38State v. Blight (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 48Fain v. Chapman (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 57State v. Fenter (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 63State v. Penn (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 67State v. Aleshire (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 72Vern J. Oja & Associates v. Washington Park Towers, Inc. (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 78Sisley v. San Juan County (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 90Joint Administrative Board of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry v. Fallon (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 97State v. Wood (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 104Jacobsen v. State (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 113In Re the Welfare of Lewis (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 118State v. Dougall (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 124Amend v. Bell (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 140International Tracers of America v. Estate of Hard (1977)
<bold>[1] Conflict of Laws — Failure To Plead Foreign Law or Show</bold> <bold>Actual Conflict — Effect.</bold> In the absence of a pleading of foreign law or a showing of an actual conflict between Washington law and the law of another state claimed to apply, a court need not take notice of another state's laws and such laws will be presumed to be the same as those of Washington. <bold>[2] Conflict of Laws — Contracts — What Law Governs —</bold> <bold>Significant Contacts.</bold> In applying the significant contacts test to determine the controlling law with respect to a contract dispute, great emphasis should be given to the place of performance. <bold>[3] Executors and Administrators — Claims — Services to Estate —</bold> <bold>Nature — Required Showing.</bold> No recovery may be<page_number>Page 141</page_number> had against an estate for unsolicited services rendered on a voluntary basis unless it is shown that those services were absolutely and immediately necessary to preserve the estate and such need would have otherwise gone unsatisfied. <bold>[4] Appeal and Error — Review — Issues Not Raised in Trial Court</bold> <bold>— In General.</bold> An appellate court will generally not consider any theory which is raised for the first time on appeal when it is one requiring a factual basis and on which the parties might have presented evidence had it been argued at trial. <bold>[5] Statutes — Validity — Burden of Proof.</bold> A statute is presumed to be constitutional and a challenging party has the burden of establishing its unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt. A statute will be upheld when a state of facts sufficient to justify its enactment can reasonably be conceived to have existed. <bold>[6] Escheat — Abandoned Property — Finder's Fee — Statutory</bold> <bold>Limitation — Validity.</bold> RCW 63.28.330, which imposes a limit on compensation paid to locate property when such property is known to be subject to state disposition as unclaimed property under RCW 63.28, is not on its face unconstitutionally arbitrary and capricious or lacking in a rational relationship to a lawful state purpose.
- 89 Wash. 2d 140INTERNAT'L TRACERS v. Hard (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 149Teagle v. Fischer & Porter Co. (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 161Crane Towing, Inc. v. Gorton (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 177Ass'n of Capitol Powerhouse Engineers v. State (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 190Seattle-First National Bank v. Brommers (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 203Department of Ecology v. Pacesetter Construction Co. (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 217State v. Ruzicka (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 236State v. Carter (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 245W. T. Watts, Inc. v. Sherrer (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 256State v. McDonald (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 276Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n v. Tollefson (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 304Ronken v. Board of County Commissioners (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 315Taylor v. City of Redmond (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 321Burlington Northern, Inc. v. Johnston (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 338Sator v. Department of Revenue (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 349State v. Herrmann (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 369Keiffer v. King County (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 376Holt v. City of Moses Lake (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 379Pier 67, Inc. v. King County (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 394Jepson v. Department of Labor & Industries (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 416State v. Agee (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 425Kyreacos v. Smith (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 430State v. Hilliard (1977)
- 89 Wash. 2d 443Boeing Co. v. State (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 454Parkridge v. City of Seattle (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 467State v. Bean (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 474Haysom v. Coleman Lantern Co. (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 488Goodell v. ITT-Federal Support Services, Inc. (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 501American States Insurance v. Milton (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 505Corp. of Catholic Archbishop v. Johnston (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 511Francis v. Francis (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 519In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Robinson (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 521State v. Franulovich (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 527McClellan v. Sundholm (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 535Mad River Orchard Co. v. Krack Corp. (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 539Haller v. Wallis (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 550United States v. 1,216.83 Acres of Land (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 558Olson v. University of Washington (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 565Lewis v. Curry College (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 571Lincoln v. Transamerica Investment Corp. (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 580Hokama v. Johnson (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 584State v. Hegge (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 592Childers v. Childers (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 606Rutcosky v. Tracy (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 613State v. Young (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 632Lurus v. Bristol Laboratories, Inc. (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 639Elliott v. Kundahl (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 646Lambert v. Peoples National Bank (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 651State v. Allen (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 660Evergreen-Washelli Memorial Park Co. v. Department of Revenue (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 664Schoultz v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 673Halvorson v. Dahl (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 678State v. Grant (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 688Anderson, Leech & Morse, Inc. v. Washington State Liquor Control Board (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 698Rupert v. Department of Social & Health Services (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 701Lamborn v. Phillips Pacific Chemical Co. (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 710Grange Insurance v. Great American Insurance (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 720State v. Mortrud (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 725Jordin v. Vauthiers (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 729Washington Ass'n of County Officials v. Washington Public Employees' Retirement System Board (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 737State v. Alton (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 740Rains v. Department of Fisheries (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 758Trust Fund Services v. Aro Glass Co. (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 764State ex rel. Keeler v. Port of Peninsula (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 769Hinkle v. McColm (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 772Lau v. Nelson (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 777In Re the Marriage of Dunkley (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 788State v. MacK (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 795Peninsula Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 803State v. Simpson (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 804Lassila v. City of Wenatchee (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 819Columbia Rentals, Inc. v. State (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 824In Re the Welfare of Lowe (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 828In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Caplinger (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 839Lakeside Pump & Equipment, Inc. v. Austin Construction Co. (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 847Wenatchee Wenoka Growers Ass'n v. Krack Corp. (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 855Abbenhaus v. City of Yakima (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 862Save a Valuable Environment v. City of Bothell (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 874Lehmann v. Board of Trustees of Whitman College (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 881Carpenter v. Island County (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 890King County Water District No. 75 v. City of Seattle (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 906Layman v. Ledgett (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 916Herberg v. Swartz (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 932Moore v. Smith (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 945In Re the Adoption of Jackson (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 953Grant County v. Bohne (1978)
- 89 Wash. 2d 959Corrigal v. Ball & Dodd Funeral Home, Inc. (1978)