Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 Wash. 2d 430 - State v. Hilliard

89 Wash. 2d 430 - State v. Hilliard’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
1
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 61 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green (1980), 108 Wash. 2d 734 - State v. Rupe (1987)

3 federal appellate · 61 state decisions

320197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Wade · Simmons v. United States · Escobedo v. Illinois · Manson v. Brathwaite

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[Ojnce an investigating officer has probable cause to believe that the person confronted has committed an offense, the officer cannot be expected to permit the suspect to leave his presence. At that point, interrogation becomes custodial, and the suspect must be warned of his rights.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The [United States Supreme] Court could scarcely have intended the issue whether the person being interrogated had 'been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his liberty in any significant way' to be decided by swearing contests in which officers would regularly maintain their lack of intention to assert power over a suspect save when the circumstances would make such a claim absurd, and defendants would assert with equal regularity that they considered themselves to be significantly deprived of their liberty the minute officers began to inquire of them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.