89 Wash. 2d 613 - State v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
120 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 122 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2024 · most notably North Carolina v. Butler (1979), 120 Wash. 2d 631 - State v. Benn (1993)
120 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1716
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. State of Maryland · Chambers v. Mississippi · Doyle v. Ohio · Cappaert v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 122 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'may assume that counsel, after diligent search, has found none.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) the declarant's testimony is otherwise unavailable; (2) the declaration is an admission of an unlawful act; (3) the declaration is inherently inconsistent with the guilt of the accused; and (4) there are such corroborating facts and circumstances surrounding the making of the declaration as to clearly indicate that it has a high probability of trustworthiness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bjelland“The law is settled in this jurisdiction that a verdict may be sustained upon evidence that the defendant participated in the commission of the crime charged, as an aider or abettor, even though he was not expressly accused of aiding and abetting and even though he was the only person charged in the information.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.