Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 Wash. 2d 651 - State v. Allen

89 Wash. 2d 651 - State v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
4
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2023

20 state decisions

90197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bird v. United States · 88 Wash. 2d 211 - State v. McHenry · State v. Cushing · State v. Tyree · 62 Wash. 2d 259 - State v. Swenson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The purpose of an instruction is to furnish guidance to the jury in its deliberations, and to aid it in arriving at a proper verdict, so far as it is competent for the court to assist them.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Evidence has been presented in this case which bears upon the good character and good reputation of the defendant. Such evidence is pertinent and proper in a criminal proceeding, and may in and of itself create a doubt as to the guilt of the defendant. Certainly such evidence should be considered by you, along with all the other evidence, in determining the guilt or innocence of the defendant.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “whether it would have been reversible error to refuse to give any instruction at all upon this matter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.