Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 Wash. App. 857 - State v. Bryant

89 Wash. App. 857 - State v. Bryant’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
2
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably State v. Wadsworth (2000), State v. Wadsworth (2000)

49 state decisions

4101998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen · Great State Beverages, Inc. v. Wenners · Attwood v. Singletary · Fussell v. Price · Woodcock v. Chemical Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person knows or acts knowingly or with knowledge when: (i) he is aware of a fact, facts, or circumstances or result described by a statute defining an offense; or (ii) he has information which would lead a reasonable man in the same situation to believe that facts exist which facts are described by a statute defining an offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the remark [was] so flagrant and ill intentioned that it evince[d] an enduring and resulting prejudice that could not have been neutralized by an admonition to the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the court determines that severance will promote a fair determination of the defendant's guilt or innocence of each offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.