Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 WIS 444 - Boldewahn v. Schmidt

Boldewahn v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
5
states following
December 1957
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 1957

8 state decisions

201895190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Laverty v. . Snethen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If a person who' is intrusted with the goods of another for a particular purpose puts them into the hands of a third person, contrary to orders, it is a conversion. A wrongful intent is not essential. It is enough if the owner has been deprived of his property by the act of another assuming an unauthorized dominion and control over it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.