89 Wis. 2d 495 - Cresci v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “, Scott v State, 64 Wis.2d 54, 59 , 218 N.W.2nd 350 (1974), it may review its sentence for abuse of discretion based upon its conclusion that the sentence was unduly harsh or unconscionable. State v. Wuensch, 69 Wis.2nd 467, 480, 230 N.W.2nd 665 (1975).”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Grindemann · State v. Randolph

2. ““a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because it was not then in existence or because, even though it was then in existence, it was unknowingly overlooked by all of the parties.” Rosado v. State, 70 Wis. 2d 280, 288 , 234 N.W.2d 69 (1975).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 113 Wis. 2d 544 - State v. Hegwood

3. “[c]ause a copy of the notice to be served upon the district attorney who shall file a written response within the time prescribed by the court”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Grindemann