Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 WVA 531 - Malcolm v. Talley

Malcolm v. Talley’s Empirical Analysis

1921

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2006

5 state decisions

20192119301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"If, for example, a Plaintiff seeks an account against the Defendant, the Court will require the Plaintiff to do equity by submitting himself to account in the same matter in which he asks an account; . . . "”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.