In the Matter of Grand Jury Proceeding Special April 1987 Appeal of Jane Doe’s Empirical Analysis
890 F.2d 1 · 1989
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 2010
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 6002
Relies on Kastigar v. United States · Fisher v. United States · Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor · Counselman v. Hitchcock · Ullmann v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a discussion of the government's use of the act of production, either directly or in a derivative fashion, against [the witness] in a criminal proceeding is premature.... The danger of the prosecution's improper use ... could arise only after [the witness] is charged with some offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.