Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 890 F.2d 1363 - United States v. Ocampo

United States v. Ocampo’s Empirical Analysis

890 F.2d 1363 · 1989

Citation profile

178
cited by 178 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

133 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 178 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2019 · most notably Smith v. United States (1993), United States of America v. Marion Promise (2001)

133 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions

14801989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · United States v. Cortez · Adams v. Williams · Hamling v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 178 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the possession of a firearm which in any manner facilitates the execution of a felony”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “during and in relation to [a] drug trafficking crime,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “To determine whether an officer's suspicion of criminal activity was reasonable, a court must evaluate the totality of the circumstances as they appeared to the officer at the time of the stop.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.