Grancorvitz v. Franklin’s Empirical Analysis
890 F.2d 34 · 1989
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2006
16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · Doyle v. Ohio · Irvin v. Dowd · Murphy v. Florida · Patton v. Yount
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[tjhere is a difference between refusing to speak about the facts of a case or explain one’s role, if any, in the crime, and not asking for medical treatment or failing to complain of injuries. The right to remain silent in the face of accusations of illegal activity only includes the former.” Id. at 42. See also id. at 43 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“does not automatically transform silence into constitutionally protected silence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Vick v. Al Lockhart“to ask the jury to draw a direct inference of guilt from silence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.