Martindale v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis
890 F.2d 410 · 1989
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2007
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Sullivan v. Hudson · Morrison v. Olson · Crim v. Commissioner · Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Bowen · Taylor v. Heckler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“28 U.S.C. § 2314(d)(2)(G) defines a 'final judgment' for EAJA purposes as 'a judgment that is final and not appealable.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the date on which a party's case has met its final demise,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Myers v. Sullivan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.