Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 890 F.2d 625 - Clark v. Township of Falls

Clark v. Township of Falls’s Empirical Analysis

890 F.2d 625 · 1989

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably Jacqueline Watson v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Greenville Women's Clinic v. Bryant (2000)

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

1501989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School District · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Maher v. Gagne · Hewitt v. Helms

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In general, when a judgment in favor of a plaintiff is reversed on the merits, that party is no longer a 'prevailing party' under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and no longer entitled to attorney's fees under that statute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]f plaintiffs could establish that their suit was the catalyst for the changes, they were entitled to prevailing party status despite the fact that the district court had ruled against them.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.