Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 890 F.2d 909 - Thomas v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Thomas v. United Parcel Service, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

890 F.2d 909 · 1989

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Mulvihill v. Top-Flite Golf Co. (2003), Cleveland v. Porca Co. (1994)

35 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

4401989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 29 U.S.C. § 173 (§ 203 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))

Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · United States v. Diebold, Inc. · United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If there are such issues, summary judgment may not be granted. In the absence of any such issues, we determine whether the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “fraud, deceitful action or dishonest conduct.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]here the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party, there is 'no genuine issue for trial.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.