Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 890 F.3d 77 - Burns v. Martuscello

Burns v. Martuscello’s Empirical Analysis

890 F.3d 77 · 2018

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
April 2023
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. · United States v. Nixon · Turner v. Safley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “construing the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and drawing all reasonable inferences in that party's favor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the First Amendment right not to speak protects the right to refuse to make false statements to the government,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “the right not to speak may be abrogated only under carefully policed circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.