Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 890 F.3d 978 - In re Bigcommerce, Inc.

In re Bigcommerce, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

890 F.3d 978 · 2018

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
February 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Eastern District Court)

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1400 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406

Relies on Neder v. United States · Standard Oil Company of New Jersey v. United States · Reiter v. Sonotone Corp. · Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Holland · Schlagenhauf v. Holder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any civil action for patent infringement may be brought in the judicial district where the defendant resides, or where the defendant has committed acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[d]efendants maintained a regular and established place of business in this judicial district, [d]efendants have purposefully directed business to this judicial district for at least several years, and [d]efendants have committed acts of infringement in this judicial district”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the general principle of statutory construction that 'where words are employed in a statute which had at the time a well-known meaning at common law or in the law of this country, they are presumed to have been used in that sense unless the context compels to the contrary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.