Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 890 NW2D 914 - State v. Muccio

State v. Muccio’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Miller v. California · New York v. Ferber · Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent · Brandenburg v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “with the intent to arouse the sexual desire of any person”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “protect[ing] children from sexual abuse and exploitation”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “any of the following acts committed without the complainant's consent, except in those cases where consent is not a defense, whether or not emission of semen occurs: (1) sexual intercourse, cunnilingus, fellatio, or anal intercourse; or (2) any intrusion however slight into the genital or anal openings: (i) of the complainant's body by any part of the actor's body or any object used by the actor for this purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.