Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 890 P2D 1125 - Howlett v. Howlett

Howlett v. Howlett’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
February 2006
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Julsen v. Julsen · Cushing v. Painter · Lee v. Cox · State v. Johnson · Epperson v. Epperson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “erred in ruling on [a father’s motion to modify a child custody order] without a hearing. “[U]nder Alaska law parties in a custody proceeding have a right to an adequate hearing, “which grants them the opportunity to present the quantum of evidence needed to make an informed and principled determination.’” T.M.C. v. S.A. C., 858 P.2d 315 (Alaska 1993) (quoting Cushing v. Painter, 666 P.2d 1044, 1046 (Alaska 1983)).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]t is reversible error for a judge to modify custody without making findings regarding the change in circumstances and the best interests of the child”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is error for a trial judge to fail to make findings on the record explaining its decision concerning appointment of a guardian ad litem.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.