Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently April 2018
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Nash v. United States · McClain v. State · State v. Kelekolio · Juneby v. State · Juneby v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To appreciate the nature and consequences of engaging in an act of sexual penetration, the victim must have the capacity to understand the full range of ordinary and foreseeable social, medical, and practical consequences that the act entails([.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]ny inherent uncertainty in the definition . . . would thus have worked to Jackson's advantage, for it would have tended to preclude him from knowing that T.Y.J. was mentally incapable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“when it is so imprecise that ordinary persons of common intelligence are left to guess at its meaning and are apt to differ as to its scope”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ragsdale v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.