Stevens v. Blevins’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2025
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schwartz v. Diehl · Gulf Oil Company v. Woodson · Humphrey v. Denney · First Nat. Bank of Seminole v. Henshaw · 406 Pa. Super. 176 - Garzone v. Kelly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In all cases in which it is made to appear to the court that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had in the county where the suit is pending, the court may, on application of either party, change the place of trial to some county where such objections do not exist.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“All venue statutes are cumulative wherever they appear and any action brought under any such statute may be maintained where brought. No court shall apply one venue statute in preference to another whether considered general or special.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a] trial court is powerless to alter a plaintiff's choice of statutorily available venue within Oklahoma unless : . . . the case was brought in a county with improper venue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. FRYE v. JOHNSON
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.