State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2009
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland · 725 So. 2d 1291 - State v. Juluke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`that there was an actual likely danger of serious bodily harm to anyone present in the highly charged atmosphere of the scene of a robbery, taking into consideration the great possibility of violence in the interaction between the offender and the victim thereby put in fear of his life.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Simply because the victim did not see a dangerous weapon does not preclude an armed robbery conviction. When defendant creates an atmosphere of intimidation prompting the victim to reasonably react with fear for his life, an armed robbery conviction is justified.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ragas“`[d]angerous weapon' includes any . . . instrumentality, which, in the manner used, is calculated or likely to produce death or great bodily harm.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.