Rodriguez v. State

Luis O. RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 10, 2004.

Rehearing Denied January 5, 2005.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-11-10

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2007

1 state decisions

Relies on 611 So. 2d 1250 - Simmons v. State · Henderson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-11-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Mark Graham Hanson, for appellant.

¶2Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Jill K. Traina, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

¶3Before COPE and GODERICH, JJ., and NESBITT, JOSEPH, Senior Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Affirmed. See Henderson v. State, 626 So.2d 310, 311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) ("Relief is not warranted where counsel merely fails to inform a client about the various ramifications of gain time as opposed to volunteering incorrect information."); Simmons v. State, 611 So.2d 1250, 1252 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) ("Neither the trial court nor counsel is required to forewarn a defendant about every conceivable collateral *281 consequence of a plea to criminal charges."); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c).