Sullivan v. DEP’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
19 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 6991C
Relies on Florida Dept. of Educ. v. Cooper · 689 So. 2d 1211 - Werner v. STATE, DEPT. OF INS. · 542 So. 2d 459 - PAC for Equality v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, FLA. ELEC. COM'N · Zurich American Insurance Company v. Whittier Properties Inc. D.B.A. Zipmart, and Ribelin Lowell & Company Insurance Brokers, Inc. · 869 So. 2d 1233 - Office of Fire Code v. Florida Dfs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"If the agency's interpretation is within the range of possible and reasonable interpretations, it is not clearly erroneous and should be affirmed," Fla. Dep't of Educ. v. Cooper, 858 So.2d 394, 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), but "judicial adherence to the agency's view is not demanded when it is contrary to the statute's plain meaning." Werner v. Dep't of Ins. & Treasurer, 689 So.2d 1211, 1214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (quoting PAC for Equal. v. Dep't of State, Fla. Elections Comm'n, 542 So.2d 459, 460 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)).”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“At issue is a question of statutory interpretation, as to which the standard of review is de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.