Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

890 So. 2d 446

Docket No. 4D04-3694.

Gazerro v. Crane

Carmine E. GAZERRO, Carmine M. Gazerro and Advanced Hair Products, Inc., Petitioners, v. Scott CRANE and Innovative Hair Recovery Centers, Inc., a Florida corporation, Respondents.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 29, 2004.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-12-29

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 2009

2 state decisions

Relies on American Exp. Travel Related Services, Inc. v. Cruz · Premiere Lab Supply Inc. v. Chemplex Industries, Inc. · 869 So. 2d 1291 - Docutek Imaging Solutions v. Copyco

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-12-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Robert L. Sader of Sader & LeMairre, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for petitioners.

¶2Laurence S. Litow of Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for respondents.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Petitioners Carmine E. Gazerro, Carmine M. Gazerro and Advanced Hair Products, Inc., seek certiorari review of a discovery order on the ground that they have been ordered to produce trade secrets and confidential business information. We grant the petition because the trial court departed from the essential requirements *447 of law in ordering the production without first conducting the requisite in camera inspection or evidentiary hearing, resulting in irreparable harm. See Docutek Imaging Solutions, Inc. v. Copyco, Inc.,869 So.2d 1291 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Premiere Lab Supply, Inc. v. Chemplex Indus., Inc.,791 So.2d 1190, 1190 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Am. Express Travel Related Servs. v. Cruz,761 So.2d 1206, 1208-09 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

¶5Petition granted. Order quashed, and case remanded.

¶6STONE, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

/890/so2d/446 · .json · Public domain