Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

890 So. 2d 553

McLeod v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 14, 2005

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-01-14

Relies on 852 So. 2d 286 - Oxendine v. State · 885 So. 2d 911 - Cook v. State

Decided 2005-01-14

PER CURIAM.

¶1Wayne McLeod appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion, in which he contended that he should not have been convicted of failure to register as a sex offender. It appears that Mr. McLeod is not challenging his sentence. Instead, he is attempting to challenge his conviction. A challenge to a conviction is not cognizable under Rule 3.800(a). See e.g., Cook v. State, 885 So.2d 911 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Oxendine v. State, 852 So.2d 286 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

¶2AFFIRMED.

PLEUS, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.
/890/so2d/553 · .json · Public domain