Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

890 So. 2d 569

In re Whitehead

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 7, 2005

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2005-01-07

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 2015

1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-01-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

¶2The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected his client’s legal matter and failed to communicate with his client. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

¶3IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Charles R. Whitehead, III, Louisiana Bar Roll number 17862, be publicly reprimanded, subject to the conditions set forth in the Petition for Consent Discipline.

¶4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

/890/so2d/569 · .json · Public domain