890 So. 2d 616 - State v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

12 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity. . . .'”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 945 So. 2d 752 - State v. Chauvin · 924 So. 2d 1125 - State v. Burciaga

2. “A reviewing court must look at the "totality of the circumstances" of each case to see whether the detaining officer has a "particularized and objective basis" for suspecting legal wrongdoing. This process allows officers to draw on their own experience and specialized training to make inferences from and deductions about the cumulative information available to them that "might well elude an untrained person."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 904 So. 2d 838 - State v. Becnel

3. “An appellate court should refrain from employing errors patent review to set aside guilty pleas about which the defendant makes no complaint and which resulted in dispositions of the cases favorable to the defendant.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Doussan