Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 890 So. 2d 806 - Mabus v. Mabus

890 So. 2d 806 - Mabus v. Mabus’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
3
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

38 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 639 So. 2d 921 - Ferguson v. Ferguson · 437 So. 2d 1003 - Albright v. Albright · Armstrong v. Armstrong · 650 So. 2d 1281 - Johnson v. Johnson · 753 So. 2d 1057 - McNeil v. Hester

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This Court will not disturb the chancellor's opinion when supported by substantial evidence unless the chancellor abused his discretion, was manifestly wrong, clearly erroneous, or an erroneous legal standard was applied.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When reviewing a decision of a chancellor, this Court applies a limited abuse of discretion standard of review.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]hen issues not raised by the pleadings are tried by expressed or implied consent of the parties, they shall be treated in all respects as if they had been raised in the pleadings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.