White v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
March 2008
most recently cited
21 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 124th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In Re King's Estate · Tibbs v. Florida · Horton v. California · Oliver v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“factual sufficiency” claims. See Minor v. State, 657 S.W.2d 811 , 812 n. 5 (Tex.Crim. App.1983) (per curiam); Combs v. State, 643 S.W.2d 709 , 716 n. 1 (Tex.Crim.App.1982); White v. State, 591 S.W.2d 851, 855 (Tex. Crim.App.1979). . See White v. State, 890 S.W.2d 131, 134 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1994, pet. ref’d) (“Our exclusive fact jurisdiction under the constitution also both permits and requires us to review for the factual sufficiency when the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged on appeal”). . See Wilson v. State, 879 S.W.2d 309, 311 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1994, no pet.) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. State · Watson v. State“against the great weight and preponderance”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Goodman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.