State v. McFerron’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2012
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Gagnon · Luster v. Cushman · Feltrop v. Missouri · Dufour v. Mississippi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The allegation by defendant that there was a proposed plea agreement available for his acceptance is a hypothecation as is the assumption that the trial judge would have accepted a particular negotiated plea agreement even had one been available.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tilton v. State“defendant may not complain of prejudice which his own conduct created”), citing, State v. Byrd, 676 S.W.2d 494, 500 (Mo. banc 1984). See also Hilton v. Crouch, 627 S.W.2d 99, 102 (Mo.App. S.D. 1982) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mayes“could have done nothing had they been at the conference, nor would they have gained anything by attending.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smulls
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.