Korman v. Lefholz’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2014
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mahoney v. Doerhoff Surgical Services, Inc. · State Ex Rel. DePaul Health Center v. Mummert · Ostermueller v. Potter · Cady v. Harlan · State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Roth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The law is that where upon the trial of a cause, a judgment is shown to have been rendered for one of the parties, and a statute directs what that judgment shall be, it is presumed that the judgment rendered by the court was such a judgment as only could have been rendered, and anything short of that will be attributed to the mistake or misprision of the clerk.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“such plaintiff may commence a new action from time to time, within one year after such nonsuit suffered ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.