Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 891 F.2d 102 - Tarka v. Franklin

Tarka v. Franklin’s Empirical Analysis

891 F.2d 102 · 1989

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
4
states following
September 2002
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 6 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 2002 · most notably Frazier v. Fairhaven School Committee (2002), Carey Ex Rel. Carey v. Maine School Administrative District 17 (1990)

3 federal appellate · 6 district · 7 state decisions

150198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Flagg Brothers Inc v. Brooks J Lefkowitz · Cotton Petroleum Corp. v. New Mexico

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any person with respect to whom an educational agency or institution maintains education records or personally identifiable information, but does not include a person who has not been in attendance at such agency or institution.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The term does not include an individual who has not been in attendance at an educational agency or institution. A person who has applied for admission to, but has never been in attendance at a component unit of an institution of postsecondary education (such as the various colleges or schools which comprise a university), even if that individual is or has been in attendance at another component unit of that institution of postsecondary education, is not considered to be a student with respect to the component to which an application for admission has been made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A student's or parent's consent is required where personally identifiable information from the educational records of a student is to be disclosed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.