Hardwick v. Cuomo’s Empirical Analysis
891 F.2d 1097 · 1989
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably Balazik, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Gerson
9 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 103 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1341 · 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission · Ingraham v. Wright · Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNary · Matthews v. Rodgers · Rosewell v. National Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]his court has recognized the doctrine of judicial estoppel to bind parties to factual and legal positions taken in litigation in both the case in which the party has taken a position and in subsequent litigation ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.