Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

891 F.2d 287

Docket No. 89-6734.

McCoy v. Neff

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Oct. 11, 1989. Decided: Nov. 16, 1989.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1989-11-16

Relies on Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · United States v. Robinson · Tommy Clay Taylor v. Judge Oliver L. Noble

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1989-11-16

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Willie Henry McCoy, appellant pro se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Todd Edward LePage, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia; Janet Page Selph, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, for appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Willie Henry McCoy noted this appeal outside the 30-day appeal period established by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1) and failed to move for an extension of the appeal period within the additional 30-day period provided by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5). The time periods established by Fed.R.App.P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

¶2

DISMISSED.

/891/f2d/287 · .json · Public domain